登录    注册    忘记密码

详细信息

A bibliometric study on trends and hotspots in integrated forest management (IFM)-related research between China and the European Union  ( SCI-EXPANDED收录 EI收录)  

文献类型:期刊文献

英文题名:A bibliometric study on trends and hotspots in integrated forest management (IFM)-related research between China and the European Union

作者:He, Lin-Xuan[1] Ma, Zhi-Yuan[1] Gong, Jin-Yu[1] Li, Tian[1] Hu, Chen[1] Lei, Jing-Pin[1]

第一作者:He, Lin-Xuan

通信作者:Lei, JP[1]

机构:[1]Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry, Key Lab Forest Silviculture, State Forestry & Grassland Adm, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China

年份:2025

卷号:36

期号:1

外文期刊名:JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH

收录:;EI(收录号:20252618662856);Scopus(收录号:2-s2.0-105008808717);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001513726700001)】;

基金:This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number: 2023YFE0112804).

语种:英文

外文关键词:Forest ecosystems; Integrative forest management; Sustainable forest management; Biodiversity protection; China-EU cooperation; Bibliometric analysis

摘要:Forest ecosystems are among the most important and play a vital role in maintaining ecological balance and supporting biodiversity. Integrated forest management (IFM) has gained prominence in European countries as a strategy to meet human needs for ecosystem services while ensuring biodiversity conservation. Given the complementary strengths of China and the European Union (EU) in forestry and the potential for collaboration, it is beneficial to compare and analyze the research status of both in IFM-related fields to provide insights into key areas and future directions for cooperation. This study employs bibliometric analysis to systematically evaluate IFM-related research status and trends between China and the EU. By examining publication trends, collaborative networks, prominent scholars, keyword co-occurrence patterns, research hotspots, and thematic clusters, providing a comprehensive overview of IFM-related research. The findings reveal that core research areas-such as forest management practices, ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and data-driven assessment methods-remain central to IFM-related research. In contrast, frontiers in climate change mitigation, disturbance and restoration dynamics, and multi-stakeholder governance represent critical areas for future exploration and collaboration. Our results provide areas for enhancing China-EU collaboration in future research in IFM.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©中国林业科学研究院 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心