文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：An Index System for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Forest Ecological Product Value Realization in China

作者：Xie, Xiansheng[1] Chen, Shaozhi[1,2] Zhao, Rong[1]

第一作者：Xie, Xiansheng

通信作者：Zhao, R[1]

机构：[1]Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry Policy & Informat, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China;[2]Chinese Acad Forestry, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China

年份：2024

卷号：15

期号：7

外文期刊名：FORESTS

收录：;EI(收录号：20243116780999);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85199623947);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001277719600001)】；

基金：This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds of the Chinese Academy of Forestry (No. CAFYBB2022MC001), the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 22BGL313), and the Fourth Batch of Forestry and Grassland Science and Technology Innovation Youth Talent Project: Mechanism of Value-Added of Ecological Product Value Realization and Effectiveness Evaluation (No. 2024132029)

语种：英文

外文关键词：forest ecological products; ecosystem services; DPSIR model; evaluation system

摘要：Forest Ecological Product Value Realization (FEPVR) is an important way for China to promote the transition and development of forestry and realize common prosperity. It is critical to assess the effectiveness of FEPVR rationally to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the progress of ecological civilization. Based on the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) model, in this study, we developed an evaluation index system for FEPVR effectiveness containing five subsystems and 37 indicators and assessed the effectiveness of FEPVR in China from 2011 to 2022 by using the linear weighted sum method, the coupling degree of coordination model, and Spearman's correlation analysis. The results showed that the composite index increased from 0.1980 in 2011 to 0.6501 in 2022, with a general upward trend, but there is still great potential for improvement. The main contribution was from the Response subsystem. The year 2017 was an important turning point for FEPVR in China because its development started to speed up; the status of coupling coordination between different subsystems was gradually improving but was still at a low level. The relationship between all indicators was dominated by a non-significant correlation (52.4%), and the overall synergistic effect (27.8%) was greater than the trade-off effect (19.8%). This study provides a new perspective for evaluating the effectiveness of FEPVR and a decision-making reference for clarifying the direction of FEPVR optimization.