文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：江西省生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系时空动态及其驱动力

英文题名：Spatiotemporal dynamics and driving forces of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Jiangxi Province

作者：杨绍微[1] 刘建锋[1] 旷远文[2] 王奇[1] 黄睿智[3] 聂稳[3] 孙婧依[1] 赵倚霈[1]

第一作者：杨绍微

机构：[1]林木资源高效生产全国重点实验室,国家林业和草原局林木培育重点实验室,中国林业科学研究院林业研究所,北京100091;[2]中国科学院华南植物园,广州510650;[3]中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所,北京100091

年份：2025

卷号：44

期号：1

起止页码：216-225

中文期刊名：生态学杂志

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Ecology

收录：;北大核心:【北大核心2023】；

基金：十四五国家重点研发计划子课题(2022YFF130180101)资助。

语种：中文

中文关键词：生态系统服务;权衡与协同;InVEST模型;影响因素

外文关键词：ecosystem service;trade?off and synergy;InVEST model;influencing factor

分类号：F42

摘要：研究生态系统服务权衡与协同关系的时空分布特征及其驱动机制,对生态系统管理和资源配置优化具有重要意义。本文应用InVEST模型量化了2000-2020年江西省生境质量、碳储量、产水量、氮磷输出和土壤保持等生态系统服务,采用Spearman相关分析及地理回归加权方法来确定生态系统服务权衡与协同关系,并运用随机森林探究生态系统服务及其权衡/协同效应的主要影响因素。结果表明:2000-2020年江西省生境质量相对稳定,TP和TN输出量呈上升趋势,碳储量呈微弱下降趋势,产水量和土壤保持量则呈先增后减趋势;在空间上,全省生境质量、碳储量和土壤保持量均呈“中间低四周高”的地理格局,TP和TN输出量则相反;生境质量与碳储量、生境质量与土壤保持量以及碳储量与土壤保持量间呈显著性协同关系,而TN输出量与生境质量、碳储量及土壤保持量则呈显著权衡关系;GDP、降水量和坡度分别为生境质量、产水量和土壤保持量的最主要影响因素,而到河流的距离是TP和TN输出量的主要影响因素;生态系统服务间的权衡(协同)强度受降水、到河流距离、到居民点距离、海拔、温度和人口数量共同作用。
Understanding the spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services is of great significance for ecosystem management and resource allocation optimization. In this study, the InVEST models were used to quantify ecosystem services in Jiangxi Province from 2000 to 2020, including habitat quality, carbon storage, water yield, total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) outputs, and soil conservation. The trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services were determined by Spearman correlation analysis and geographically weighted regression, and their determinants were further identified by random forests. The results showed that habitat quality of Jiangxi Province remained relatively stable during the study period. The TP and TN outputs showed an increasing trend. Carbon storage showed a slight decreasing trend, and water yield and soil conservation increased but followed by decreasing trends. Habitat quality, carbon storage and soil conservation exhibited spatial patterns of “low in middle and high in the periphery”, while TP and TN outputs were opposite. There were significant synergies between habitat quality and carbon storage, between habitat quality and soil conservation, and between carbon storage and soil conservation. There were trade-offs between the outputs of TN and habitat quality, carbon storage and soil conservation. Gross domestic product, precipitation and slope were the determinants on habitat quality, water yield and soil conservation, respectively. The distance to river was the driving factor for the TP and TN outputs. The intensities of trade-offs/synergies between ecosystem services were jointly regulated by precipitation, the distance to rivers and settlements, elevation, temperature and population.