文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Comparing Four Evapotranspiration Partitioning Methods from Eddy Covariance Considering Turbulent Mixing in a Poplar Plantation

作者：Wang, Xin[1,2,3] Zhou, Yu[4] Huang, Hui[1,2,3] Gao, Xiang[1,2,3] Sun, Shoujia[1,2,3] Meng, Ping[1,2,3] Zhang, Jinsong[1,2,3]

第一作者：Wang, Xin

通信作者：Huang, H[1];Zhang, JS[1];Huang, H[2];Zhang, JS[2];Huang, H[3];Zhang, JS[3]

机构：[1]Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Forestry, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China;[2]Nanjing Forest Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southe, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China;[3]Henan Xiaolangdi Forest Ecosyst Natl Observat & Re, Jiyuan 454650, Peoples R China;[4]Jining Polytech, Jining 272000, Peoples R China

年份：2024

卷号：16

期号：11

外文期刊名：WATER

收录：;EI(收录号：20242416256785);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85195779365);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001245341400001)】；

基金：No Statement Available

语种：英文

外文关键词：turbulent mixing; evapotranspiration partitioning; eddy covariance; transpiration; subcanopy

摘要：Evapotranspiration is a key link in the water cycle of terrestrial ecosystems, and the partitioning of evapotranspiration is a prerequisite for diagnosing vegetation growth and water use strategies. In this study, we used double-layer eddy covariance (DLEC) measurements within and above the canopy of poplar plantations to divide evapotranspiration into transpiration and evaporation during the growing season. We diagnosed the coupling state of airflows in the canopy vertical layer and found that the daytime coupling state at the half-hourly scale can mask nighttime decoupling. Furthermore, we investigated the daytime and nighttime vertical layer airflow coupling states separately and quantified the effects of coupling states on the DLEC of resolved transpiration. The partitioning results of the DLEC method were taken as the standard after the airflow coupling test. Then, the performance and accuracy of evapotranspiration partitioning for the modified relaxed eddy accumulation (MREA), the conditional eddy covariance (CEC), and the flux variance similarity (FVS) with DLEC were compared. Transpiration calculated from MREA showed the best agreement with DLEC, and the other methods showed different degrees of underestimation (1:1 slope = 0.64-0.83). Evaporation calculated from FVS showed the best agreement with DLEC, while CEC and FVS made an overestimation of more than 26% (1:1 slope = 1.26-1.99), but MREA made an underestimation from 5% to 35% (1:1 slope = 0.65-0.95). The correlation coefficients between DLEC and MREA for transpiration were 0.95-0.97 with RMSEs of 15.52-17.04 W m-2, and those between DLEC and FVS for transpiration were 0.73-0.78 with RMSEs of 10-21.26 W m-2 at the daily half-hourly scale. A detailed comparison of the differences between DLEC and evapotranspiration partitioning methods from high-frequency eddy covariance data under the condition of canopy vertical layer airflow mixing provides knowledge about the consistency of results for evapotranspiration partitioning in poplar plantation forests.