文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：新世纪北京市生态足迹变化及对策研究

英文题名：Change of Beijing's Ecological Footprint and Its Countermeasure in the New Century

作者：李剑泉[1] 田康[1] 陈绍志[1]

第一作者：李剑泉

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院科技信息研究所

年份：2014

卷号：37

期号：4

起止页码：102-109

中文期刊名：林业经济

外文期刊名：Forestry Economics

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；

基金：国家软科学研究计划重大合作项目"突破国际贸易壁垒的中国木材合法性认定标准体系研究"(编号:2012GXS2B009);国家林业局林业软科学研究项目"中国林产品进出口贸易技术标准体系研究"(编号:2013-R02)

语种：中文

中文关键词：生态足迹;生态承载力;生态赤字;对策建议

外文关键词：ecological footprint; ecological capacity; ecological deficit;countermeasure

分类号：F307.2

摘要：根据相关统计数据，应用生态足迹理论和方法，对北京2000--2012年生态足迹和生态承载力进行测算和分析，结果表明：在13年间，人均生态足迹为3．08～3．61Ghm2，呈抛物线波状发展态势；人均生态承载力呈逐年下降趋势，从2000年0．22Ghm。降至2012年0．14Ghm2；人均生态足迹比生态承载力高13，3～20．8倍，亦呈增长态势，导致人均生态赤字维持在2．89～3．44Ghm。的高水平上，北京地区始终处于巨额生态赤字之中。生态赤字组成由大到小依次是能源、耕地、草地、林地和水域，只有建筑用地为生态盈余；区域人口增长过快和资源消耗量过大是导致北京巨额生态赤字的重要原因；促进社会经济平衡发展、强化科技创新与成果推广和资源节约成为缓解生态赤字的关键对策。
Based on the theory and methods of ecological footprint, ecological footprint and ecological capacity in Beijing from 2000 to 2012 were calculated and analyzed according to the relevant statistics. The results showed that, during the 13 years, the ecological footprint per capita was between 3.08 Ghm2 and 3.61 Ghm2, it had a parabolic wave change trend; The ecological capacity per capita declined year by year, it decreased from 0.22 Ghm2 in 2000 to 0.14 Ghm2 in 2012; Meanwhile, the ecological footprint per capita were 13.3-20.8 times more than the ecological capacity per capita with an increase trend, which led to the ecological deficit per capita at a high level between 2.89 and 3.44 Ghm2. Obviously, Beijing area had always been a huge ecological deficit in the new century. There were ecological deficits in different lands with a descending order, which were carbon land, cropland, grazing land, forest land and fishing ground, but only an ecological surplus in built up land; The important reasons caused the mas- sive ecological deficits were the excessive growth of regional population and excessive resource consumption in capital area; And the key countermeasures relieved Beijing＇s ecological deficit were the balanced development of social economy, technological innovation and achievement popularization, and resource conservation.