文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：3种无损检测方法评估巨尾桉木材抗弯和抗压强度性质

英文题名：Evaluating bending and compressive strength properties of Eucalyptus grandia×E. urophylla plantation wood with three nondestructive methods

作者：罗彬[1,2] 殷亚方[1] 姜笑梅[1] 骆秀琴[1] 刘波[1,3] 郭起荣[2,3]

第一作者：罗彬

通信作者：Luo, B.

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所;[2]江西农业大学园林与艺术学院;[3]国际竹藤网络中心

年份：2008

卷号：30

期号：6

起止页码：137-140

中文期刊名：北京林业大学学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Beijing Forestry University

收录：CSTPCD;;EI(收录号：20085111791965);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-57449098617);北大核心:【北大核心2004】；CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】；

基金：“948”国家林业局引进项目(2005-4-73);中澳ACIRA合作项目(FST/1999/095)

语种：中文

中文关键词：巨尾桉;人工林;无损检测;抗弯弹性模量;抗弯强度;顺纹抗压强度

外文关键词：Eucalyptus grandia ×E. urophylla; plantation;nondestructive testing; modulus of elasticity;modulus of rupture;compressive strength parallel to grain

分类号：S718.2

摘要：为探讨不同无损检测方法评估木材强度性质的可行性及可靠性,该文分别运用纵向基频振动、超声波和应力波3种无损检测方法,对由广西东门林场采集的34株14年生巨尾桉人工林加工的191个无疵小试样进行了抗弯和抗压强度性质预测。首先采用3种无损检测设备获得无疵小试样的动态弹性模量,然后进行抗弯弹性模量(MOE)、抗弯强度(MOR)和顺纹抗压强度(σc)的测定,并分析3种无损检测结果与木材强度性质的关系。结果表明:纵向基频振动法、超声波法和应力波法获得的动态弹性模量Efr、Eus和Esw与静态MOE的相关系数分别为0.8166、0.7889和0.6347,均在0.001水平上显著相关;与MOR的相关系数分别为0.6940、0.6830和0.5673,均在0.001水平上显著相关;与σc的相关系数分别为0.8103、0.8093和0.6489,均在0.001水平上显著相关;其中应力波法测得的动态弹性模量Esw与木材强度性质的相关系数均为最低。可见,纵向基频振动法和超声波法能够比较精准地预测国标无疵小试样的MOE、MOR和σc,但应力波方法对无疵小试样进行测定时具有一定局限性。
The objective of this study is to compare three nondestructive methods for evaluating the bending modulus of elasticity （MOE）, modulus of rupture （MOR） and compressive strength parallel to grain （σc） of Eucalyptus grandia × E. urophylla plantation wood. Thirty-four Eucalyptus plantation trees at 14 years old were selected in Dongmen Forest Farm, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, southern China. All the sample trees were cut into 191 small clear specimens, for which three dynamic modulus of elasticity, ie longitudinal vibration （Efr）, ultrasonic wave （Eus） and stress wave （Esw）, were measured in the air-dry condition. Static bending and compressive strength tests were then performed to determine the MOE, MOR and a c. The correlation coefficients obtained in this study were 0.816 6,0. 788 9 and 0. 634 7 respectively between dynamic MOE （ Efr, Eus and Esw ） and static MOE （ P 〈 0.001 ）. Meanwhile, the correlation coefficients were 0.694 0,0.683 0 and 0.567 3 between dynamic MOE （Eft, Eus and Esw） and MOR （P 〈 0.001）. The correlation coefficient between dynamic MOE （ Efr, Eus and Esw ） and ac were 0. 810 3,0. 809 3 and 0. 648 9 （P 〈 0.001 ）. The results showed that the correlations between Esw based on stress wave method and wood strength properties was the lowest in comparison with longitudinal vibration and ultrasonic wave method. This study also indicates that the longitudinal vibration and ultrasonic wave could provide accurate predictions of the bending properties and compressive strength of small clear specimens prepared in accordance with Chinese national standard. On the other hand, stress wave method has more limitation for anticipation on the mechanical properties of small clear specimens.