文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：长江上游森林生态区生物多样性保护优先区确定——基于生态区保护方法

英文题名：Setting biodiversity conservation priorities in the Forests of the Upper Yangtze Ecoregion based on ecoregion conservation methodology

作者：吴波[1] 朱春全[2] 李迪强[3] 董珂[2] 王秀磊[3] 石培礼[4]

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院林业研究所国家林业局林木培育重点实验室;[2]世界自然基金会中国分会;[3]中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所;[4]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所

年份：2006

卷号：14

期号：2

起止页码：87-97

中文期刊名：生物多样性

外文期刊名：Biodiversity Science

收录：CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2004】；CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】；

基金：世界自然基金会(WWF);保护国际(CI)资助);美国大自然保护协会(TNC)资助

语种：中文

中文关键词：长江上游森林生态区;生物多样性保护规划;优先区;连接带;指示物种

外文关键词：ecoregion, the Forests of the Upper Yangtze （FUY）Ecoregion, biodiversity conservation plan,priority area, linkage, indicator species

分类号：S763;X176

摘要：邀请110位在长江上游地区开展生物多样性研究与保护的专家,分4个阶段进行了参与式研讨,采用生态区保护方法确定了兽类、鸟类、两栖和爬行类、昆虫、真菌和维管植物等生物类群的指示物种和保护优先区,最后确定了长江上游森林生态区内16个生物多样性保护优先区和5个连接带。16个优先区中,7个具有最高优先性,即秦岭、大巴山、金佛山-梵净山-武陵源区、岷山、邛崃山-大相岭、贡嘎山、三江并流核心区;9个具有高优先性,即伏牛山、米仓山、若尔盖高原、凉山、攀西地区、中甸-木里地区、川西北高原、金沙江上游高山峡谷区、怒江—澜沧江高山峡谷区。目前这些优先区及连接带内保护区的分布很不平衡:某些优先区和连接带内保护区面积所占比例很小甚至没有保护区分布;某些优先区人为干扰比较强烈,生境破碎化比较严重。建议通过新建自然保护区和调整已有的保护区,填补保护空缺,完善自然保护区系统;结合国家重点生态建设工程和生物多样性保护行动,保护天然林,恢复退化植被,在优先区和连接带内限制人类经济活动,以确保优先区和连接带发挥应有的生态功能。
One hundred and ten specialists who are engaged in biodiversity conservation participated in a 4-phase participatory study to determine indicator species and biodiversity priority areas for mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles, insects, fungi, and vascular plants for the Forests of the Upper Yangtze （FUY） Ecoregion. Based on ecoregion conservation methodology, 16 priority areas were identified. Of these, Qinling Mountains, Daba Mountains, Jinfo-Fanjing-Wulingyuan area, Minshan Mountains, Qionglai-Daxiangling Mountains, Gongga Mountains, and Three Parallel Rivers area are among the list of the highest priority areas, while Funiu Mountains, Micang Mountains, Zoige Plateau, Liangshan Mountains, Panzhihua-Xichang area, Zhongdian-Muli area, northwestern Sichuan Plateau, Upper Jinsha River Basin Alps-Ravines, and Nujiang-Lancang River Basin Alps-Ravines have high priority. At present, the distribution of nature reserves does not match the priority areas and linkages. Nature reserves cover a tiny proportion, or even none, of the priority areas or linkages; some are disturbed by intense human activities and are consequently severely fragmented. It is proposed here that existing nature reserves should be adjusted and new ones established to fillconservation gaps. In conjunction with national eco-construction programmes and biodiversity conservation actions, natural forests should be strictly protected, degraded vegetation should be effectively rehabilitated, and human economic activities should be strictly controlled to enhance the functions of the conservation priority areas and their linkages.