文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：深圳与西安生态文化建设公众需求的对比研究

英文题名：A Comparative Study of the Public Requirements in Eco-culture Construction Between Shenzhen and Xi'an City

作者：张昶[1,2] 王成[1,2] 孙睿霖[1,2] 郄光发[1,2]

第一作者：张昶

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院林业研究所;[2]国家林业局城市森林研究中心

年份：2016

卷号：0

期号：1

起止页码：64-70

中文期刊名：北京林业大学学报：社会科学版

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

基金：林业公益性行业科研专项经费课题(201404030106)

语种：中文

中文关键词：生态文化建设;公众需求;对比分析

外文关键词：eco-culture construction; public requirements; comparative analysis

分类号：G05

摘要：以问卷调查的方式,对深圳、西安两个城市生态文化建设的公众需求进行了对比分析与归纳探讨。结果表明:1对于生态文化感知载体,二地居民均表现出对自然感知载体的极强偏好,但深圳居民偏向于功能主导的空间,而西安城市居民则偏向于地点主导的空间;2对于活动载体,二地居民均表现出对公益型、体验型、节庆型生态文化社会活动的偏好;3对于产品载体,二地居民均对其了解不够全面,对服务生态文化产品的认知度很低(西安在该点上更明显),深圳品质保健类产品、西安文艺传媒类产品开发潜力较大;4对于教育载体,二地居民在知识结构上均不平衡,同时在教育内容上均表现出对本地问题的关心和日常生活与环境之间关系的关注,在途径上均表现出对自然教育与综合展示型教育的偏爱,但深圳居民偏向以多元方式形成丰富的教育途径,西安居民则更多地偏向以空间差异划分不同的教育途径。
The public requirements in eco-culture construction of Shenzhen and Xi＇an City were comparatively analyzed,induced and discussed by questionnaire survey. The results showed that： 1）regarding perception carrier of eco-culture,the residents in both Shenzhen and Xi＇an strongly preferred nature areas,however,the residents in Shenzhen more preferred function-oriented space,while in Xi＇an location-oriented space. 2） on the event carrier,the residents in both cities preferred the social service,the experiential,and the festival eco-cultural activities. 3） for the eco-cultural product,the residents in two cities understood it incompletely,and the recognition to the service types of eco-cultural products was very low（ even more significantly in Xi＇an）; and there should be more development potential for the health-care eco-cultural products in Shenzhen and media eco-cultural products in Xi＇an. 4） considering educational carrier,the residents in two cities showed unbalance in the structure of ecological knowledge,and they were caring about the local environmental problems and situations, and concerning the relationship between the environment and their daily life. Moreover,the natural experience and pavilion were the most favorable educational methods to the residents in both cities,while the residents inShenzhen preferred the versatile learning ways by multiple methods,and the residents in Xi ＇an more liked different learning ways in the differential separated spaces.