文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：可变生长率法和固定生长率法在单木年生长预测中的比较研究

英文题名：Comparison of Annual Individual-Tree Growth Models Based on Variable Rate and Constant Rate Methods

作者：张雄清[1] 雷渊才[1]

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所

年份：2009

卷号：22

期号：6

起止页码：824-828

中文期刊名：林业科学研究

外文期刊名：Forest Research

收录：CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2008】；CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】；

基金："十一五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目(2006BAD23B02)

语种：中文

中文关键词：直径年生长量;存活率;固定生长率法;可变生长率法

外文关键词：annual diameter growth; survival probability; constant rate method; variable rate method

分类号：S758

摘要：采用北京山区油松定期调查数据,比较研究固定生长率法和可变生长率法建立的单木直径年生长量模型和年存活率模型。研究结果表明:利用可变生长率法建立的直径生长模型中,平均偏差(-0.0059)、平均绝对偏差(0.7791)、均方根误差(1.0384)分别比固定生长率法的平均偏差(0.0975)、平均绝对偏差(0.9200)、均方根误差(1.1983)小,而且其决定系数(0.9493)也高于固定生长率法的决定系数(0.9178);在单木存活率模型中,可变生长率法的平均偏差(8.59E-7)、平均绝对偏差(0.0884)、均方根误差(0.2117)也分别比固定生长率法的平均偏差(0.0027)、平均绝对偏差(0.0911)、均方根误差(0.2121)小,并且其对数似然值(-4 137.2400)也比固定生长率法的对数似然值(-4230.3200)大。因此,利用可变生长率法建立的单木生长模型预测精度比利用固定生长率法建立的单木生长模型预测精度高,因为前者考虑了林分因子(林分断面积,林分优势高)和单木因子在生长期间的变化引起的单木直径年生长量及存活率的变化。
The inventory data of the Chinese pine （Pinus tabulaeformis） in Beijing Mountains were used to establish and compare individual tree diameter growth and survival models with constant rate method and variable rate method. Results showed that in the individual-tree diameter growth model, MD was - 0. 005 9, MAD 0. 779 1, RMSE 1. 198 3 and R 2 0. 949 3 based on the variable rate method. But with the constant rate method, they were 0.097 5, 0. 917 8, 1. 198 3 and 0. 917 8 respectively. In the survival model, MD was 8.59E -7, MAD 0. 088 4, RMSE 0. 211 7, and LogL-4 137. 240 0 using the variable rate method. But with the constant rate method, they were 0.002 7, 0. 091 1, 0.212 1, and - 4 230. 320 0 respectively. The variable rate method out-performed the constant rate method in predicting future individual tree survival and diameter growth because the former accounted for the variable rate of annual diameter growth and tree survival probability, which were caused by changes of stand （basal area, dominant height） and tree attributes.