文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：基于地表节肢动物多指标的北京城市绿地土壤生物质量评估

英文题名：Assessment for Soil biological quality of the Summer Palace in Beijing based on multi-indicator of ground-dwelling Arthropods

作者：叶董[1] 刘丹[1] 言迫[2] 丁敏[1] 仇兰芬[3] 苏化龙[4] 林英华[1]

第一作者：叶董

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所,北京100091;[2]四川若尔盖湿地国家级自然保护区管理局,阿坝藏族羌族自治州624599;[3]北京市园林绿化科学研究院园林绿地生态功能评价与调控技术北京市重点实验室,北京100102;[4]中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所,北京100091

年份：2025

卷号：45

期号：20

起止页码：10103-10112

中文期刊名：生态学报

外文期刊名：Acta Ecologica Sinica

收录：;北大核心:【北大核心2023】；

基金：园林绿地生态功能评价与调控技术(二期)(STZD202402);国家自然科学基金项目(31570603)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：地表节肢动物;土壤生物质量评价指数;主坐标方法分析;绿地养护;北京颐和园

外文关键词：ground-dwelling arthropods;soil biological quality evaluation indices;PCoA;garden maintenance;the Summer Palace in Beijing

分类号：S154.5

摘要：利用地表节肢动物多指标评估城市公园绿地类型及其管护措施对土壤生物质量的影响,对科学管理与提升城市绿地生态服务功能具有重要的意义。2023年4—8月,采用陷阱法调查北京市三种典型城市绿地植被类型——桧柏(Sabina chinensis)、绦柳(Salix matsudana)与山桃(Prunus davidiana)地表节肢动物群落与Hill′s数的多样性指数,并基于地表节肢动物QBS-ar、QBS-ab、FEMI与SBI-bf指数分析绿地类型、生态与化学养护措施对城市土壤生物质量的影响。结果显示,绿地地表节肢动物以铺道蚁属(Tetramorium)、卷甲虫属(Armadillidium)、爪甲螨属(Unguizetes)、小甲螨属(Oribatella)、长跳属(Entomobrya)为优势类群,其营养功能群以捕食性类、植食性类与腐食类为主。绦柳绿地地表节肢动物类群最丰富,山桃绿地优势类群最丰富;生态养护区地表节肢动物类群数明显高于化学养护区地表节肢动物类群数(P<0.05)。研究时段地表节肢动物个体总数、Hill′s数的多样性指数变化随时间呈现增加的趋势,但优势类群与常见类类群对绿地类型与养护措施反应不敏感。基于Bray-Curtis距离的主坐标方法(PCoA)与置换多因素方差分析检验(Per MANOVA)分析表明,采样时间(R^(2)=0.222,P<0.01)对地表节肢动物群落的影响大于绿地类型、养护措施(R^(2)=0.09,R^(2)=0.03,P<0.01)地表节肢动物群落的影响,且化学养护对地表节肢动物群落具有一定的抑制作用。虽然地表节肢动物QBS-ar、QBS-ab、FEMI与SBI-bf指数随着采样时间变化趋势略有差异,但不同月份之间土壤生物质量状况与土壤生物整体质量一致,均以桧柏土壤生物质量相对最好,山桃土壤生物质量相对较差,显示生态养护有益于提升土壤生物质量。建议对城市绿地开展地表节肢动物监测,并通过QBS-ar、QBS-ab、FEMI与SBI-bf指数综合评价城市绿地土壤生物质量,减少城市绿地养护措施存在的外来污染源,以提升城市绿地的生态功能。
Evaluating the impact of urban green land types and maintenance on soil biological quality through multiple indicators of ground-dwelling arthropods is critical for optimizing urban green space management and enhancing ecological service functions.From April to August 2023,we investigated the community composition and Hill′s diversity indices of ground-dwelling arthropods in three typical green areas(Sabina chinensis,Salix matsudana,and Prunus davidiana)in Beijing using pitfall traps.We integrated four soil biological quality indices,including QBS-ar,QBS-ab,FEMI,and SBI-bf,to analyze the effects of green space types and ecological vs.chemical management measures on urban soil biological quality.The results showed that the dominant taxa of ground-dwelling arthropods were Tetramorium,Armadillidium,Unguizetes,Oribatella,and Entomobrya,with trophic functional groups dominated by predators,phytophages,and saprozoic organisms.The most abundant arthropod groups were found in Salix matsudana green ground,while the most dominant group was observed in Prunus davidiana green ground.Ecological maintenance significantly increased the number of ground-dwelling arthropod taxa compared to chemical maintenance areas(P<0.05).The result indicated that the total number of ground-dwelling arthropod individuals and Hill′s diversity indices showed an increasing trend over time,while the dominant group and common group displayed low sensitive to green land types and garden maintenance.The PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distance and Per MANOVA showed that sampling time(R^(2)=0.222,P<0.01)exerted the strongest impact on the surface arthropod community than the green space type and maintenance measures(R^(2)=0.09,R^(2)=0.03,P<0.01),and the chemical maintenance demonstrated inhibitory effect on the community.Although the ground-dwelling arthropod QBS-ar,QBS-ab,FEMI and SBI-bf indices varied slightly with sampling time,the monthly soil biological quality conditions aligned with overall trends.The Sabina chinensis green land exhibited optimal soil biological quality,contrasting with the poorest performance in Prunus davidiana green land.Ecological maintenance consistently improved the soil biological quality.These findings underscored the utility of monitoring ground-dwelling arthropods using QBS-ar,QBS-ab,FEMI,and SBI-bf to assess the effectiveness of urban green space maintenance.We recommended minimizing chemical inputs in maintenance protocols to mitigate pollution and enhance the ecological functions of urban green infrastructure.