文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：不同药剂处理毛竹的室内耐腐性

英文题名：Decay Resistance of Bamboo Treated with Different Preservatives

作者：王雅梅[1] 刘君良[2] 蒋明亮[2] 覃道春[3]

第一作者：王雅梅

机构：[1]内蒙古农业大学;[2]中国林科院木材工业研究所国家林业局木材科学与技术重点实验室;[3]国际竹藤网络中心

年份：2007

卷号：21

期号：5

起止页码：8-10

中文期刊名：木材工业

外文期刊名：China Wood Industry

收录：CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2004】；

基金："十五"国家科技攻关计划子课题-竹材防护技术研究(2004BA506B0302);中英木材防腐合作技术的研究及应用示范

语种：中文

中文关键词：竹材;防腐剂;室内耐腐性能

外文关键词：bamboo; preservative; laboratory decay resistance

分类号：S782.33;S795

摘要：选择ACQ、铜唑、CCA、有机酸四类13种防腐剂对毛竹材进行处理,研究竹材的室内耐腐性能。结果表明:随着吸药量的增加,药剂对腐朽菌的抑制效力明显增加。ACQ防腐剂中,综合抗菌性能依次为ACQ-B、ACQ-D,ACQ-C对白腐菌的毒性最差,失重率约6%;铜唑类防腐剂对白腐菌的抗菌性最好的是CuAz-1,最差的是CuAz-2;对褐腐菌的抗菌性相差不大。通过对比,ACQ和铜唑类防腐剂的抗菌性与CCA相当,明显优于有机酸类防腐剂。
A laboratory decay experiment was conducted on bamboo（Phyllostachys pubecens）with 13 kinds of preservatives that were used and compared. The results showed that, 1）The effects of different preservatives improved when the retention level was increased. 2）The decay resistance of ACQ-B was the best among all the five ACQ preservatives, and was followed by ACQ-D. At a low retention,the resistance of ACQ-C to white rot was the worst, and the weight loss rate reached about 6%. 3）Among the four CuAz formulations, CuAz-1 showed the best resistance to white rot, while CuAz-2 was the worst. But, there was little difference for the resistance to brown rot. 4）The decay resistance of ACQ and CuAz were close to CCA, and obviously superior than organic acid preservative.