文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：林业生态建设的社会经济驱动力评价:来自四川和湖北的实证

英文题名：Evaluation on Social and Economic Driving Forces for Forestry Ecological Construction: Evidence from Sichuan and Hubei

作者：廖显春[1] 耿伟[2] 何友均[3] 张德成[3] 李智勇[3]

第一作者：廖显春

机构：[1]南开大学经济学院;[2]天津财经大学;[3]中国林科院科信所

年份：2013

期号：8

起止页码：69-72

中文期刊名：生态经济

外文期刊名：Ecological Economy

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2012_2013】；

基金：林业行业公益性专项"生态驱动项目:生态建设驱动模式与监测评价研究"(201004016)

语种：中文

中文关键词：林业生态建设;林农户;生态补贴;意愿调查

外文关键词：forestry ecological construction; forestry household survey; ecological compensation; willingness to accept

分类号：F326.2

摘要：中国长期以来从事林业生态建设工程,如天然林保护工程和退耕还林工程。然而,中国的环境问题如生物多样性丧失、水土流失、沙漠化进一步恶化。该研究目的旨在从林农户视角调查林业生态建设的社会经济驱动力,基于对171林农户的调研,采用多变量回归模型,对其愿意接受补贴,从事生态环境生产进行分析。结果表明,94%的林农户愿意接受补贴,从事生态环境生产。但是,补贴高达每年每公顷6033元。计量结果进一步揭示,受教育程度越高、距离城市越远、农业收入较高,其索要的生态补贴就越高。与此相反,部分在自己地上劳作的农户和农地面积较大的农户,其索要的生态补贴就较低。
China has been engaging in one of the world’s largest ecological conservation programs,the Slope Land Conversion Program（SLCP）,in order to improve its vulnerable environmental conditions.The SLCP is also called the grain-for-green policy.While the SLCP has drawn broad attention,little has been done to investigate households’ incentives for environmental protection.This study is intended to identify farmers’ willingness to accept compensation for China’s incentive-based programs（CIP）,while designing policies to facilitate the implementation of the CIP to replace the Sloping Land Conversion Program（SLCP）.With the surveys of 171 households,a multivariate regression model was used to conduct empirical analysis for willingness to accept（WTA）.The results show that more than 94% of farmers are willing to accept compensation to engaging in ecological restoring production with more than 6033 Yuan per hectare.Farmers with high education,long distance to city,and more income from farmland have relatively high opportunity costs so that they are not willing to conduct the production of multiple-use forest.In contrast,households farming on their own land and having large land area have relatively low opportunity costs so that they are not willing to provide ecological service.This study not only benefits China’s sustainable development,but also provides insights into other developing countries.