文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：4种国产引诱剂对松墨天牛诱捕效果的比较分析

英文题名：Comparison and analysis on attracting effects of four kinds of Chinese trapping attractants on Monochamus alternatus

作者：王义平[1] 郭瑞[1] 张真[2]

第一作者：王义平

机构：[1]浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院;[2]中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所

年份：2012

卷号：34

期号：3

起止页码：142-144

中文期刊名：北京林业大学学报

外文期刊名：Journal of Beijing Forestry University

收录：CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】；

基金："948"国家林业局引进项目(2009-4-36)

语种：中文

中文关键词：引诱剂;松墨天牛;诱捕效果

外文关键词：attractant; Monochamus alternatus; trapping effect

分类号：S763.3

摘要：在固定的剂量下和相同的时间段内,对国产4种引诱剂在浙江富阳林间对松墨天牛成虫进行了诱捕试验。结果表明,4种引诱剂对松墨天牛都有一定的引诱效果。其中,浙江产的ZGHC-M-99和上海产的HYP-SH引诱剂的引诱效果显著高于福建产的FJ-Ma-05引诱剂,但与广东产的A-3引诱剂差异不大。基于所诱捕到的松墨天牛成虫个体数,4种引诱剂的诱捕效果由强到弱依次是ZGHC-M-99引诱剂、HYP-SH引诱剂、A-3引诱剂、FJ-Ma-05引诱剂。诱捕结果分析表明,4种引诱剂的引诱效果具有一定的地理差异性。
Using identically timed and defined doses, four kinds of attractants, ZGHC-M-99, HYP-SH, A-3, and FJ-Ma-05, which were made in China, were used for baiting Monochamus alternatus in the fields of Fuyang in Zhejiang Province, eastern China. The results indicated that the four test attractants had a certain ability to trap M. alternatus, among which, ZGHC-M-99 and HYP-SH had a comparatively stronger effect than FJ-Ma-05. Compared with A-3, ZGHC-M-99 and HYP-SH did not display distinct difference on attraction effect on M. alternatus. Based on the number of adult M. alternatus captured by attractants, ZGHC-M-99 had the highest efficiency, followed by HYP-SH, A-3, and FJ-Ma-05, respectively. The chemical attractants seem to have different efficacies in different geographical areas.