文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：基于不同受益者的双台河口湿地生态系统主导服务功能

英文题名：Dominant ecosystem services of Shuangtai estuary wetland based on different beneficiaries.

作者：孙宝娣[1,2] 崔丽娟[1,2] 李伟[1,2] 康晓明[1,2]

第一作者：孙宝娣

机构：[1]中国林业科学研究院湿地研究所;[2]湿地生态功能与恢复北京市重点实验室

年份：2017

卷号：36

期号：1

起止页码：164-171

中文期刊名：生态学杂志

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Ecology

收录：CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；CSCD:【CSCD2017_2018】；

基金：林业公益性行业科研专项(201404305)资助

语种：中文

中文关键词：受益者;双台河口湿地;主导服务功能;层次分析法

外文关键词：beneficiaries;Shuangtai estuary wetland;dominant ecosystem services;analytic hierarchy process

分类号：X171

摘要：由于湿地生态系统服务功能具有多样性、空间分布的不均衡性以及人类使用的选择性等特性,在人为活动和自然因素的作用下,服务功能之间会出现权衡或者相互增益的变化特征。明确不同受益者对湿地生态系统服务功能的关注程度,对制定区域发展与湿地生态保护"双赢"的政策措施具有重要意义。本文以典型滨海湿地辽宁省双台河口湿地自然保护区为研究对象,运用层次分析法(AHP)从当地受益者、省域受益者、全国受益者和全球受益者四个层次对双台河口湿地的物质生产、调蓄洪水、固碳、气候调节、大气调节、促於造陆、消浪护岸和休闲旅游等8项服务进行两两比较,并运用专家打分法进行打分。结果表明:当地受益者关注的主导服务功能为物质生产和消浪护岸两项,其权重值分别为0.2234和0.2154;省域受益者主要关注休闲旅游和气候调节,其权重值分别为0.2740和0.2230;全国受益者主要关注气候调节和大气调节,其权重值分别为0.2155和0.2150;全球受益者主要关注固碳和大气调节,其权重值分别为0.2939和0.2161。针对不同受访者社会属性特征包括年龄、收入、教育背景和职业4个方面进行分析,表明不同社会特征的受益者关注的湿地生态系统的主导服务功能并不相同。本研究为今后不同湿地生态系统服务的价值取舍及不同受益者之间的权衡提供理论支撑。
Due to the diversity of wetland ecosystem services,the imbalance of their spatial distribution and the selectivity of human use,the relations between wetland ecosystem services will have trade-offs and mutual gain variations under the effects of anthropogenic and natural factors.Understanding the degree of concerns on the wetland ecosystem services from different beneficiaries is of great importance to formulate regional development and wetland protection policies and measures. In our study,we selected the Shuangtai Estuary National Reserve in Liaoning Province as the study region,and used the analytic hierarchy process（ AHP） to pairwise compare different wetland ecosystem services,including substance production,flood control,carbon sequestration,climate regulation,gas regulation,creating land with silt,eliminating waves for revetment and leisure tourism at four levels of beneficiaries from local,provincial,national and global administrative areas. We also used the expert scoring method to grade those wetland ecosystem services from the four levels of beneficiaries. The results showed that the local beneficiaries mainly focused on substance production and eliminating waves for revetment, with weights of 0. 2234 and0.2154; provincial beneficiaries mainly focused on leisure tourism and climate regulation,with weights of 0.2740 and 0.2230; national beneficiaries mainly focused on climate regulation and thegas regulation,with weights of 0.2155 and 0.2150; global beneficiaries mainly focused on carbon sequestration and gas regulation,with weights of 0.2939 and 0.2161. Moreover,based on the different social attribute characteristics of different interviewees,such as age,income,education background and profession,our results showed that different beneficiaries with different social attributes focused on different wetland ecosystem services. These results can provide theoretical supports for the choice of the values of different ecosystem services and also for the trade-offs among different beneficiaries in the future.