文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Greenhouse gas footprint assessment of wood-based panel production in China

作者：Lao, Wan-Li[1] Chang, Liang[1,2]

第一作者：劳万里

通信作者：Chang, L[1]

机构：[1]Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Wood Ind, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China;[2]Xiangshan Rd, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China

年份：2023

卷号：389

外文期刊名：JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

收录：;EI(收录号：20230513458458);Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85146834663);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000964456800001)】；

基金：This work was financially supported by the key research and development program of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, People's Republic of China (GLM [2021] 7).

语种：英文

外文关键词：GHG footprint; Wood-based panels; Biogenic carbon; Delayed emissions; Emission-reduction measures

摘要：China is one of the largest manufacturers, consumers, and traders of wood-based panels (WBPs) globally. The Chinese manufacturing process for WBPs is significantly different from that used in other countries and the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint assessment of this process has not yet received attention. And a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of different approaches to estimate the delayed emission of biogenic carbon on the GHG footprints of different WBP types is still missing. This study aims to quantify: i) the GHG footprint of WBPs produced in China, and ii) the influence of different methods to assess the delayed emission of biogenic carbon. Cradle-to-gate life cycle models are developed for plywood (PLY), fiberboard (FB), particleboard (PB) and ori-ented strand boards (OSB). Based on two common end-of-life (EoL) destinations (i.e., incineration and landfill), three approaches to the estimation of the delayed emissions of biogenic carbon in cradle-to-grave assessments are compared. The cradle-to-gate results show that the GHG footprints of PLY, FB, PB and OSB without considering biogenic carbon storage are 538 kg CO2 e/m3, 406 kg CO2 e/m3, 348 kg CO2 e/m3 and 552 kg CO2 e/m3, respectively. For the four types of WBPs, resources extraction stage provides the largest contribution to the GHG footprints (55%-81%), followed by the production process (18%-31%) and raw material transportation (1%- 18%). The methodologies used to assess delayed emissions in cradle-to-grave WBP GHG footprint assessments play an important role, especially for incineration scenarios. Finally, emission reduction measures are proposed based on reducing the consumption of adhesives and of energy use in the production process.