文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Selecting a core germplasm population using molecular markers: a case study with Eucalyptus pellita grown in common garden trials

作者：Zhao, Haiwen[1] Wang, Ping[1] Gu, Qiaocai[1] Li, Changrong[2,3] Bush, David[4] Weng, Qijie[1] Zhou, Changpin[1] Li, Fagen[1]

第一作者：Zhao, Haiwen

通信作者：Li, FG[1]

机构：[1]Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Trop Forestry, Key Lab Natl Forestry & Grassland Adm Trop Forestr, Guangzhou 510520, Peoples R China;[2]Guangxi Forestry Res Inst, Guangxi Key Lab Super Timber Trees Resource Cultiv, 23 Yongwu Rd, Nanning 530002, Peoples R China;[3]Guangxi Forestry Res Inst, Key Lab Cent South Fast Growing Timber Cultivat Fo, 23 Yongwu Rd, Nanning 530002, Peoples R China;[4]CSIRO, Australian Tree Seed Ctr, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

年份：2025

卷号：25

期号：1

外文期刊名：BMC PLANT BIOLOGY

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-105019535168);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001600061800004)】；

基金：This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China during the 14th Five-year Plan Period (2022YFD2200203-2) and the Fundamental Research Funds of Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2021ZA001).

语种：英文

外文关键词：Eucalyptus pellita; SSR markers; Genetic diversity; Population structure; Core germplasm

摘要：Germplasm resources are crucial for revitalizing of the forest industry and plant breeding. Eucalyptus pellita is one of the most widely planted tropical eucalyptus species used for pulp and timber production. Maintaining large field-based germplasm collections for breeding and conservation is expensive. A smaller "core" population, retaining most of genetic diversity, is an efficient strategy. A comparative analysis using the marker-based tools DARwin, CoreFinder, and Core Hunter identified hypothetical subpopulations from 10 to 15% of the source population size, while still capturing the majority of the broader population diversity. Examination of phenotypic data in the source and hypothetical core populations over 34 months allowed comparison of growth and survival, and the effects of mortality on marker-based diversity parameters. After 34 months, the survival in the source population was 88%, while that in the core subsets ranged from 82 to 90%. Populations with higher heterozygosity showed somewhat superior survival, and the core population constructed using CoreFinder displayed marginally higher observed heterozygosity (Ho) and superior growth traits. Population structure and discriminant principal component (DAPC) analyses revealed that the study population was divided into two main subpopulations: New Guinea (NG) and Australia(AUS). The proportion of samples from NG and AUS selected using the three methods differed significantly, with the ratios from CoreF and CoreH closely resembling the source population. Although survival declined over time, the genetic diversity remained largely constant. Since the growth of the NG material was somewhat better than that of the AUS provenances, we advocate modifying the core selections or conducting selections within regions of provenance to ensure that the best breeding materials are represented in the core subpopulations. We explore the practicality of employing marker-based methods to select a core population in genebanks and/or breeding populations that rely on genetic diversity for trait improvement, which are likely to experience ongoing mortality due to inbreeding depression and competition.